Analisis Yuridis Kekuatan Pembuktian Tangkapan Layar sebagai Alat Bukti Elektronik dalam Perkara Perceraian

Authors

  • Ika Yulianti Fitri Rambe Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
  • Nur Ikhwan Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
  • Anggi Sri Haryati Simarmata Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/perspektif.v3i2.981

Keywords:

Electronic evidence, ITE Law, Judicial discretion, Law of evidence, Screenshot

Abstract

Digital evolution in the pattern of social interaction of the community also has a significant influence on the dynamics of the national judicial system. The transformation covers all judicial sectors, both religious and public, especially related to the technique of presenting evidence in the litigation process. This research is carried out with normative legal methods and is descriptive analytical. The author utilizes secondary data obtained through library search, which is then processed with qualitative normative analysis techniques. The legitimacy of screenshots as evidence has been explicitly regulated in applicable regulations. Referring to the renewal of the ITE Law in Law Number 1 of 2024, Article 5 paragraph (1) affirms that electronic information and its printed results are recognized as valid evidence before the law. This study shows that normatively, screenshots have a strong legal position in the civil system. However, in the reality of the trial, this instrument is positioned as a free evidence (vrij bewijs), which means that the weight of the evidence is not absolute and depends on the judge's evaluation and conviction.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Acara, H. (n.d.). No Title.

Haerul, S., Sailellah, I., & Bajawa, P. N. (2025). Iblam Law Review.

Hal, B. A. B. I., & Tugas, M. (1941). No Title.

Hukum, J. I., & Alat, K. (2023). No Title. Unknown, 6(2), 207–216.

Imron, A., & Iqbal, M. (n.d.). Hukum pembuktian.

Juanda, E. (1998). Kekuatan alat bukti dalam perkara perdata menurut hukum positif Indonesia. 27–46.

Kedua, P. (2024). Elektronik dalam.

Kesha, R., N, A. K., Jafair, M. A. B., & Putri, R. C. (2026). Dalam hukum acara perdata Indonesia. Journal of Golden Generation Legal Science, 374–383.

Kurniawan, M. B. (2018). Equitable distribution of matrimonial property. 41–53.

Nunukan, P. N. (n.d.). Autentikasi alat bukti elektronik dalam memperlancar. Unknown, 12(2), 135–151.

Probolinggo, P. A. (2024). Putusan Pengadilan Agama.

Putusan, A. (2026). Kedudukan hukum tangkapan layar percakapan melalui aplikasi WhatsApp. Unknown, 5.

Romadiyah, S. N. (2021). Analisis jenis-jenis alat bukti dan kekuatan bukti digital dalam pembuktian acara perdata. Unknown, 4(2).

Taufiqoh, K. A., Rahmawati, D., & Joko, L. (2024). Keabsahan alat bukti elektronik dalam pembuktian perkara perdata. Unknown, 9, 150–160.

Verawati. (n.d.). Perdata.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-24

How to Cite

Ika Yulianti Fitri Rambe, Nur Ikhwan, & Anggi Sri Haryati Simarmata. (2026). Analisis Yuridis Kekuatan Pembuktian Tangkapan Layar sebagai Alat Bukti Elektronik dalam Perkara Perceraian . Perspektif Administrasi Publik Dan Hukum, 3(2), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.62383/perspektif.v3i2.981

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.