The author(s) declare that this Analisis Perspektif Hukum Persaingan Usaha Indonesia dalam Kasus Penyalahgunaan Posisi Dominan oleh Platform Digital TikTok Shop vs Shopee
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/hukum.v3i1.858Keywords:
Acquisition, Business Competition, Digital Platforms, Dominant position, ICCAbstract
This study evaluates the legal perspective concerning business competition in Indonesia regarding alleged abuse of dominant power in the competition between digital platforms TikTok Shop (including the acquisition of Tokopedia) and Shopee. The method applied is normative juridical with a case study approach, referring to Law Number 5 of 1999, particularly Articles 19–21 related to market control and Article 20 concerning below-cost selling practices. The analysis focuses on inter-platform integration, aggressive discount strategies, use of cross-platform data, as well as post-acquisition behavior that may hinder healthy competition. The assessment is conducted by considering market structure, business actors' behavior, and law enforcement efforts by the Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU). Research findings indicate that although TikTok Shop has strong competitiveness following the acquisition, proving the existence of abuse of a dominant position requires meeting legal and economic provisions rigorously. Therefore, the implementation of conditional approval and remedial measures by the KPPU is considered a reasonable step to maintain a healthy business competition environment in the digital era.
Downloads
References
Crémer, J., de Montjoye, Y. A., & Schweitzer, H. (2019). Competition policy for the digital era. European Commission.
Eisenmann, T., Parker, G., & Van Alstyne, M. (2011). Platform envelopment. Strategic Management Journal, 32(12), 1270–1285. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.935
Evans, D. S., & Schmalensee, R. (2016). Matchmakers: The new economics of multisided platforms. Harvard Business Review Press. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2793021
Hukumonline. (2023). Perspektif hukum persaingan usaha dalam akuisisi TikTok Shop dan Tokopedia. Hukumonline.com.
Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika Republik Indonesia. (2022). Peta jalan ekonomi digital Indonesia 2021–2024. Kementerian Kominfo RI.
Khan, L. M. (2017). Amazon’s antitrust paradox. Yale Law Journal, 126(3), 710–805.
Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha. (2023). Siaran pers pengawasan persaingan usaha pada sektor ekonomi digital. KPPU Republik Indonesia.
Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha. (2024). Penetapan persetujuan bersyarat atas akuisisi PT Tokopedia oleh TikTok. KPPU Republik Indonesia.
Motta, M. (2004). Competition policy: Theory and practice. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804038
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). An introduction to online platforms and their role in the digital transformation. OECD Publishing.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2020). Competition in digital markets. OECD Publishing.
Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 57 Tahun 2010 tentang Penggabungan atau Peleburan Badan Usaha dan Pengambilalihan Saham Perusahaan yang Dapat Mengakibatkan Terjadinya Praktik Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat.
Reuters. (2023). TikTok revives Indonesia e-commerce business after Tokopedia deal. Reuters Business News.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktik Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat.
Varian, H. R., Shapiro, C., & Carl, S. (2004). Information rules: A strategic guide to the network economy. Harvard Business School Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik dan Negara
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
