Analisis Efektivitas Sistem Informasi Penelusuran Perkara (SIPP) bagi Pengguna Layanan Pengadilan
Studi pada Informasi Jadwal Persidangan di Pengadilan Negeri Surabaya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/hukum.v3i1.927Keywords:
Case Tracking System, Court Schedule Information, Digital Service Effectiveness, Public Information Transparency, Socio-digital EffectivenessAbstract
Digital transformation in judicial institutions is aimed at improving transparency, efficiency, and legal certainty for the public. One of the main instruments in the digitization of the judiciary in Indonesia is the Case Tracking Information System (Sistem Informasi Penelusuran Perkara/SIPP), which functions as a means of case administration as well as a medium for public information disclosure. Although SIPP is considered to be running well from an administrative perspective, its effectiveness from the point of view of service users, particularly in providing information on court schedules, still shows limitations in its practical use. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of SIPP in providing information and certainty regarding court schedules for service users at the Surabaya Class IA Special District Court. This study uses a qualitative approach with a descriptive research type. Data was obtained through in-depth interviews with service users and court officials, observation, and review of documents and system data. The analysis was conducted using the Socio-digital effectiveness framework, which focuses on three dimensions, namely user experience, citizen engagement, and public value, to examine the relationship between digital systems, user experience, and the social meaning of public judicial services. The analysis shows that the SIPP has been quite effective in providing access to court schedule information at the administrative level. This effectiveness is reflected in the openness of information access, which can be used by the public without special authentication. However, at the level of practical use, there are still limitations in terms of timeliness and consistency of information updates when there are delays or changes to the court schedule. This affects the user experience in planning attendance and shapes perceptions of the reliability of the digital information provided by the court.
Downloads
References
Badan Peradilan Umum Mahkamah Agung RI. (2025). Evaluasi Implementasi SIPP. Evaluasi.Badilum.Mahkamahagung.Go.Id. https://evaluasi.badilum.mahkamahagung.go.id/
Dinata, A. (2019). Sistem Informasi Penelusuran Perkara (SIPP): Apa Itu & Apa Manfaatnya untuk Pengadilan? Polluxintegra.Co.Id. Date Accessed December, 10. 2025. https://polluxintegra.co.id/sistem-informasi-penelusuran-perkara-sipp-inovasi-digital-bidang-hukum/
Hadi, I., & Widnyani, I. A. P. S. (2024). Modernisasi dan Digitalisasi Public Servis: Mewujudkan Indonesia Emas Melalui Harmonisasi Sistem Pemerintahan Berbasis Elektronik (SPBE). Jurnal Kridatama Sains Dan Teknologi, 6(02), 639–658. https://doi.org/10.53863/kst.v6i02.1398
Laporan Tahunan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Tahun 2024, 358 (2024). Date Accessed December, 10. 2025. https://www.mahkamahagung.go.id/cms/media/13641
Li, W. (2021). The role of trust and risk in Citizens’ E-Government services adoption: A perspective of the extended UTAUT model. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(14). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147671
Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. (2025). Mahkamah Agung Mempersiapkan Penerapan Smart Majelis Hakim pada Pengadilan Tingkat Pertama. Marinews.Mahkamahagung.Go.Id. Date Accessed December 10, 2025. https://marinews.mahkamahagung.go.id/berita/mahkamah-agung-mempersiapkan-penerapan-smart-majelis-hakim-0su
Manoharan, A. P., Melitski, J., & Holzer, M. (2022). Digital Governance: An Assessment of Performance and Best Practices. Public Organization Review, 23(1), 265–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-021-00584-8
Mergel, I. (2021). Digital Transformation of the German State. In Handbook of Digital Public Administration (pp. 341–357). Springer Nature Link. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53697-8_19
Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2019). Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis A Methods Sourcebook Edition 3. In SAGE Publications, Inc.
Mulyono, B., Affandi, I., Suryadi, K., & Darmawan, C. (2022). Online Civic Engagement : Fostering Citizen Engagement Through Social Media. Jurnal Civic Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan, 19(1), 75–85. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21831/jc.v19i1.49723
Nurlinah, Ansar, M. C., & Chowdhury, K. (2025). Impact of Government Digital Transformation on Citizen Trust and Participation : Evidence From Gowa Regency , Indonesia. Frontiersin.Org, 7, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fhumd.2025.1700582
Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Pekanbaru. (2019). Surat Keputusan Ketua Mahkamah Agung Nomor 71/KMA/SK/IV/2019 tentang Pemberlakuan Aplikasi Sistem Informasi Penelusuran Perkara Pengadilan Tingkat Banding dan Pengadilan Tingkat Pertama pada Empat Lingkungan Peradilan. Ptun-Pekanbaru.Go.Id/. Date Accessed September 27, 2025. https://ptun-pekanbaru.go.id/2019/04/16/surat-keputusan-ketua-mahkamah-agung-nomor-71-kma-sk-iv-2019-tentang-pemberlakuan-aplikasi-sistem-informasi-penelusuran-perkara-pengadilan-tingkat-banding-dan-pengadilan-tingkat-pertama-pada-empat-lin/
Peraturan Presiden (Perpres) Nomor 95 Tahun 2018 Tentang Sistem Pemerintahan Berbasis Elektronik (2018).
Sangaji, M. S. J., & Irianto, J. (2025). Transformasi Inovasi Pelayanan Publik menuju Pemerintahan Digital. Jejaring Administrasi Publik, 17(1), 54–70. https://doi.org/10.20473/jap.v17i1.72708
Surat Keputusan Ketua Mahkamah Agung Nomor 269/KMA/SK/XII/2018 Tentang Tata Kelola Teknologi Informasi Dan Komunikasi Di Lingkungan Mahkamah Agung Dan Badan Peradilan Yang Berada Di Bawahnya (2018).
Surat Keputusan Ketua Mahkamah Agung Nomor 71/KMA/SK/IV/2019 Pemberlakuan Aplikasi Sistem Informasi Penelusuran Perkara Pengadilan Tingkat Banding Dan Pengadilan Tingkat Pertama Pada Empat Lingkungan Peradilan (2019). https://jdih.mahkamahagung.go.id/index.php/legal-product/71kmaskiv2019/detail
Syafira, D., Sabrila, F., Ramadhani, S., Ghozali, M. T., & Hanoselina, Y. (2026). Penggunaan Aplikasi e-Court dan Sistem Informasi Penelusuran Pekara ( SIPP ) sebagai kemudahan pelayanan di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara ( PTUN ) Padang. Jurnal Intelek Dan Cendikiawan Nusantara, 2(6), 13562–13573. https://jicnusantara.com/index.php/jicn/article/view/6293
Ubaidillah, A., Ridwandono, D., & Pratama, A. (2024). Analisis Tingkat Kepuasan Pengguna Sistem Informasi Penelusuran Perkara Pada Pengadilan Negeri Sidoarjo Kelas 1A Khusus. Global Leadership Organizational Research in Management, 2(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.59841/glory.v2i1.821
Udoh, E. S., & Luna-reyes, L. F. (2025). Exploring the Impacts of Social and Technical Aspects of Governance on Smart City Projects. MDPI, 1–20.
Xhafka, E., Sinoimeri, D., & Teta, J. (2024). Evaluating the Impact of E-Governance on Public Service Improvement in Albania: A Quantitative Analysis. Sustainability (Switzerland), 16(24). https://doi.org/10.3390/su162410896
Xu, W. (2024). A “User Experience 3.0 (UX3.0)” Paradigm Framework: User Experience Design for Human-Centered AI Systems. Cornell University. https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.01609
Yungkul, Y. (2025). Optimalisasi Sistem Administrasi Publik dalam Meningkatkan Efektivitas Pelayanan Pemerintahan di Era Digital. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 6(7), 3103–3111. https://doi.org/10.59141/japendi.v6i7.8431
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik dan Negara
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
