Revitalisasi Keadilan dalam Kasus Pungutan Liar Bantuan Sosial PKH terhadap Korban dari Perspektif Viktimologi

Rifalina Fredita; Gracia Violeta; Dinda Kartika Dewi; St Nada Oktaviani; Fidela Humaira Ismoyo C; Isni Fitria Ramadhani

doi:10.62383/hukum.v2i4.394

Authors

Rifalina Fredita Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
Gracia Violeta Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
Dinda Kartika Dewi Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
St Nada Oktaviani Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
Fidela Humaira Ismoyo C Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
Isni Fitria Ramadhani Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/hukum.v2i4.394

Keywords:

Extortion, PKH, Revitalizing Justice, Victim, Vivtimology

Abstract

Extortion in the distribution of social assistance for the Family Hope Program (PKH) is one of the structural problems that hinders the effectiveness of the program in empowering the poor. This practice not only harms the recipients of assistance, but also violates the principles of social justice. This article aims to examine the case of extortion in PKH from a victimology perspective, focusing on its impact on victims, both psychologically and socio-economically. This study uses an empirical legal methodology using a field research approach and a sociological legal approach. The data obtained was processed qualitatively which was then analyzed descriptively. The results of the study show that victims of extortion experience greater losses, not only in the form of loss of funds, but also in the form of damage to trust in social and state institutions. In addition, this study proposes several steps to revitalize justice in handling extortion cases, including increasing supervision, public education, and bureaucratic reform that can restore public trust in the PKH program. Thus, revitalizing justice in this context is expected to create a more just social environment and reduce the practice of extortion in the future.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al Arif, M. N. F., & Karsa, P. L. (2022). PEMBENTUKAN KECAMATAN DI KOTA SERANG: PENGUATAN OTONOMI DAERAH DAN GOOD GOVERNANCE DALAM PELAYANAN PUBLIK. Perspektif, 27(2), 104–114. https://doi.org/10.30742/perspektif.v27i2.827

Astuti, A. E., Asphianto, A., & Fajar Al Arif, M. N. (2022). CRIMINAL LAW ENFORCEMENT ANALYSIS AGAINST INDEPENDENT PRACTICE MIDWIVES IN COMMITTING UNLAWFUL ACTS. JHR (Jurnal Hukum Replik), 10(2), 90. https://doi.org/10.31000/jhr.v10i2.6226

Cartwright, P. (n.d.). Consumer Protection and the Criminal Law: Law, Theory, and Policy in the UK.

Fauzi, A., Widiastuti, I., & Suharno, S. (2022). Analysis of Enterpreneurial Intent in Vocational High School Students Based on a Review on Contextual, Background, and Personal Characteristics. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Teknik Dan Kejuruan, 15(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.20961/jiptek.v15i1.64951

Hiariej, E. O. S. (2014). Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Pidana. Cahaya Atma Pustaka.

Hosnah, A. U., Wijanarko, D. S., & Sibuea, H. P. (2021). Karakteristik lmu Hukum dan Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif (D. Safitri, Ed.; 1st ed.). Rajawali Pers.

Moeljatno. (2008). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Rineka Cipta.

Nasution, D. K., Fauzi, A., & Ruslan, R. (2021). Legal Certainty on The Implementation of Electronic Registration of Liability Rights Performed by The Office of The Land Act Maker (Study at the Office of the Land Act Maker Deli Serdang). Veteran Law Review, 4(2), 120. https://doi.org/10.35586/velrev.v4i2.2669

Romdoni, M., Fathullah, Fatma, M., & Darwis, Z. (2023). Inconsistency in judges’ legal considerations addressing special narcotics crimes. The International Journal of Politics and Sociology Research, 11(1), 188–194.

Romdoni, M., & Lussak, A. (2023). Pivoting Indonesian law school pedagogy in pandemic era: A conceptual recommendation for empathetic, inclusive, and equitable experience. 030003. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0148407

Romdoni, M., WN, S. F., & Nurdiansyah, R. (2022). Impact Of Political Policy On The Implementation Of Law Enforcement. Mediation: Journal of Law, 1(2), 67–74.

Santoso, T. (2020). Hukum Pidana (Suatu Pengantar). PT RajaGrafindo Persada.

Sudarto. (1990). Hukum Pidana I. Yayasan Sudarto Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro.

Sulistyaningtyas, D. S., Yulia, R., & Arif, M. N. F. Al. (2022). Patients’ Rights Fulfillment towards Medicines Information Services; Law Enforcement and Pharmacist Criminal Liability. International Journal of Social Sciences Review, 3(2), 66–78. https://doi.org/10.57266/ijssr.v3i2.98

Yulia, R., Prakarsa, A., & Fauzi, A. (2018). LEUIT AND CUSTOMARY VIOLATION IN BADUY (Case Study of Leuit Fire in Cisaban Baduy Village). Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 18(1), 47. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2018.18.1.1606

Achmad, M. F. dan Y. (2012). Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Empiris & Normatif. Pustaka Pelajar.

ANANDA MUHAMAD TRI UTAMA. (2022). Dugaan Praktik Pungutan Liar pada Bantuan

Sosial Program Keluarga Perspektif Undang-Undang Nomor 31 tahun 1999 jo Undang

Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. 9(2), 356

363.

Arliman S, L. (2020). Penanganan Perkara Tindak Pidana Pungutan Liar oleh Penyidik Direktorat Kriminal Khusus. Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 22(1), 49–72. https://doi.org/10.24815/kanun.v22i1.13564

Dirdjosisworo, S. (1984). Ruang Lingkup Kriminologi. Remadja Karya.

Dwi, R. &. (2023). Peran Negara dalam Pemberantasan Pungutan Liar (Pungli): Kajian Hukum Pidana dan Perdata. Jurnal Hukum Indonesia, 15, 234–235.

Fajri, A. K. (2022). Analisis Kebijakan Penanggulangan Kemiskinan Melalui Program Keluarga Harapan. Gema Publica, 7(1), 158–170. https://doi.org/10.14710/gp.7.1.2022.158-170

Group, K. P. M. (2004). Observasi dan Wawancara. Bayumedia Publishing.

Humas. (n.d.). Panduan Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH). https://www.kemensos.go.id.

Humas. “ Peraturan Presiden Nomor 87 tahun 2016”, https://kelembagaan.ristekdikti.go.id. Diakses pada Tanggal 04 April 2025, pukul 02.12 WIB.

Humas. “Satuan tugas sapu bersih pungutan liar”, https://setkab.go.id. Diakses pada Tanggal 14 April 2025, pukul 00.32 WIB.

Indonesia, K. S. R. (n.d.). Layanan Pengaduan Pungutan Liar. https://www.kemsos.go.id/pungutan-liar.)

Kamaluddin, M., Pangestu, R. D., Zuhri, M. D., Mayjen, U., Mojokerto, S., & Madura, U. (2024). VIKTIMOLOGI DAN UPAYA PEMULIHAN MELALUI KOMPENSASI. 9(1), 33–42.

Kumorotomo, W. (1994). Sistem Informasi Manajemen dalam Organisasi Organisasi Publik. Gajah Mada University Press.

LBH Pengayoman “Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Pungutan Liar Di Indonesia”, https://lbhpengayoman.unpar.ac.id. Diakses pada Tanggal 04 April 2025, pukul 01.40 WIB.

Mamudji, S. (2005). Metode Penelitian dan Penulisan Hukum. Badan Penerbit Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia.

Marzuki, P. M. (2005). Penelitian Hukum. Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Maulana, I., & Agusta, M. (2021). Konsep dan Implementasi Restorative Justice di Indonesia. Datin Law Jurnal, 2(2), 49. https://ojs.umb-bungo.ac.id/index.php/DATIN/article/view/734

Mawardi, I. (2022). Pungli dan Ketakutan Struktural pada Masyarakat Miskin.

Nugroho, Y. (2019). Trust Deficit: Tantangan Sosial dalam Kebijakan Publik di Indonesia.

Pena Hukum, J., & Masyarakat, D. DI. (n.d.). Akibat Hukum Pungutan Liar (Pungli) Serta Dampak Yang. 11, 1–18. http://openjournal.unpam.ac.id/JPH

Penelitian, L., Hasil, P., Ensiklopedia, P., & Arliman, L. (2024). Hukum Dan Masyarakat: Peran Sosiologi Hukum Dalam Memahami Interaksi Sistem Hukum Dengan Realitas Sosial. Ensiklopedia of Journal, 6(3), 10–12. http://jurnal.ensiklopediaku.org

Rangga Satria Harahap. 2013. “Menggagas Indonesia tanpa korupsi”, Yogyakarta: Moco Media, halaman 57.

Rawls, J. (1971). Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press.

Sugiyono. (2013). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Sulistiyowati, R. (2020). Korupsi dalam Penyaluran Bantuan Sosial: Studi Kasus dan Dampaknya terhadap Penerima. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 50.

Tempo. (2021). Modus Potongan Bantuan Sosial: Warga Dipaksa Serahkan Sebagian Dana. https://www.tempo.co

Tim Penyusun. (2008). Biaya Transportasi Barang Angkutan, Regulasi, dan Pungutan Jalan di Indonesia.

Waluyo, B. (2002). Penelitian Hukum Dalam Praktek. Sinar Grafika.

Wibowo, N. S. (2022). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Kekerasan dalam Rumah Tangga: Pendekatan Psikososial dan Bantuan Hukum. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 45, 98–105.

Wijaya, R. (2021). Peranan Organisasi Non-Pemerintah dalam Pemberantasan Pungutan Liar: Studi Kasus LBH dan NGO di Indonesia. Jurnal Advokasi Dan Hukum 10, 46–60.

Wikström, P.-O. H., & Ceccato, V. (n.d.). The Role of Social Environment in Victimization: A Victimological Perspective. International Journal of Victimology. International Journal of Victimology, 137–157. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0269758014556044

Yulia, R. (2022). Victimologi; Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Kejahatan. Graha Ilmu.

Zulkifli, M. & S. W. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Pelapor Tindak Pungutan Liar di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum & Keadilan, 45–62.

Zulkifli, Suadi, & Alwi. (2021). Penyalahgunaan Bantuan PKH: Motif dan Dampak (Studi Kasus di Gampong Bluka Teubai Kecamatan Dewantara Kabupaten Aceh Utara). Jurnal Sosiologi Agama Indonesia (JSAI), 2(2), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.22373/jsai.v2i2.1492.