Analisis Perbandingan Sistem Hukum Eropa Kontinental dengan Sistem Anglo Saxon yang Ditinjau dari Perspektif Sistem Juri

Achmad Barlian Dipantara

doi:10.62383/hukum.v2i6.662

Authors

Achmad Barlian Dipantara Universitas Darul Ulum Jombang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/hukum.v2i6.662

Keywords:

Civil Law, Common Law, Criminal Justice System, Jury System, Legal System

Abstract

The Continental European legal system and the Anglo-Saxon legal system, particularly in the context of jury application, by exploring the philosophical, procedural, and normative implications of each system. The Continental European legal system, rooted in the civil law tradition, emphasizes the codification of laws as the primary source of legal rules, often sidelining the role of juries in the judicial process. On the other hand, the Anglo-Saxon legal system, which adheres to common law, places the role of the jury as a crucial element in determining facts and delivering verdicts in trials. This research utilizes a comparative approach to identify fundamental differences between the two systems, with an emphasis on the role and authority of juries in the context of law enforcement and judicial processes. This analysis includes a study of the role of juries in each legal system, their impact on procedural justice, as well as the shortcomings and advantages that arise from the implementation of both systems in the context of community life. Using a normative qualitative research method, this study concludes that although there are significant differences in the application of the jury system, both systems contribute importantly to the development of justice principles within the broader framework of international justice. This research also presents recommendations regarding the potential integration of positive elements from each system to enrich legal practices in Indonesia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anderson, P. (2021). Judicial participation and reform of the jury system in the common law tradition. Oxford University Press.

Davidson, R. (2021). Trial by peers: The evolution of the jury system in Anglo-American law. Cambridge University Press.

Foster, L. (2023). Public perception and fairness in the Anglo Saxon jury system. Journal of Comparative Law and Justice, 12(2), 115–134. https://doi.org/10.5232/jclj.2023.12.2.115

Hartono, B. (2024). Keadilan partisipatif dalam sistem juri Anglo Saxon: Sebuah analisis normatif. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Demokrasi, 9(1), 55–72.

Hasanah, R. (2022). Peran hakim dalam sistem hukum kontinental modern: Antara objektivitas dan moralitas hukum. Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Sosial, 8(3), 201–218.

Kurniawan, A. (2023). The role of judicial professionalism in the Kontinental legal system. European Legal Review, 17(1), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.4102/elr.2023.17.1.45

Lestari, M. (2024). Kepastian hukum dan keadilan substantif dalam sistem hukum perbandingan. Jurnal Yustisia Global, 10(1), 23–39.

Lukman, A. (2023). Philosophical foundation of Kontinental and Anglo Saxon law systems. International Review of Legal Studies, 5(4), 78–94.

Mahendra, I. (2024). Prospek penerapan sistem juri campuran (jury mixte) di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Indonesia, 6(2), 144–160.

Nugraha, D. (2022). Bias sosial dalam praktik sistem juri Anglo Saxon: Analisis empiris. Jurnal Hukum dan Masyarakat, 7(3), 215–232.

Prasetyo, T. (2021). Konvergensi sistem hukum dunia: Perspektif perbandingan Anglo Saxon dan Kontinental. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Pratama, E. (2022). Perbandingan sistem hukum Anglo Saxon dan Eropa Kontinental dalam konteks globalisasi hukum. Jurnal Hukum Internasional dan Perbandingan, 4(2), 101–119.

Rahman, A. (2023). Keadilan substantif vs kepastian hukum dalam sistem hukum global. Jurnal Filsafat Hukum Nusantara, 9(1), 66–82.

Santoso, D. (2022). Sistem hukum dan metode perbandingan dalam studi hukum modern. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Saragih, J. (2021). Sejarah dan perkembangan sistem hukum Eropa Kontinental. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.

Siregar, M. (2022). Relevansi sistem juri bagi reformasi hukum Indonesia. Jurnal Reformasi Peradilan Indonesia, 8(1), 33–49.

Suharto, P. (2021). Hakim sebagai aktor utama dalam sistem hukum kontinental. Jurnal Hukum Nasional, 5(2), 56–73.

Tanuwidjaja, F. (2023). Hybrid legal systems: Integrating Kontinental and Anglo Saxon traditions in modern courts. Global Law Journal, 11(3), 89–107.

Utami, D. (2024). Menuju sistem hukum partisipatif di Indonesia: Tantangan dan peluang. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Nasional, 10(2), 122–139.

Widodo, S. (2023). Transparansi dan partisipasi publik dalam reformasi hukum nasional Indonesia. Jurnal Tata Negara dan Keadilan, 9(2), 145–163. https://doi.org/10.55292/9wn3gh67

Yusuf, N. (2024). Transnational justice and the convergence of legal systems: A comparative analysis. Journal of International Legal Studies, 13(1), 77–95. https://doi.org/10.5897/jils.2024.13.1.77