Analisis Pelanggaran Hak Konsumen terhadap Kasus Pengoplosan Beras Merek Daun Suji

Authors

  • Elvira Clarista Faiqah Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji
  • Rodhia Tammardhiah Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji
  • Qian Ramadhani Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji
  • Vincent Anderson Simanjuntak Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/hukum.v2i3.284

Keywords:

Consumer Rights, Consumer Protection, Rice

Abstract

Consumer protection in Indonesia is regulated in Law No. 8/1999 on Consumer Protection (UUPK), which emphasizes consumers' basic rights to safe and quality goods. This research focuses on the violation of consumer rights in the “Daun Suji” brand rice oplosan case, which came to light in February 2025. The results show that the oplosan “Daun Suji” rice does not meet the promised premium rice quality standards. This resulted in a violation of consumer rights, specifically Article 4 letters b and c of the Consumer Protection Law. These violations include the right of consumers to choose goods according to exchange value and guarantees, as well as the right to correct and clear information. This fraudulent practice harms consumers who expect quality products at the price paid.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Handoko, D. D., Jumali, Mardiah, Z., Suhartini, Septiapningrum, E., Liyanan, WP, S. D., Kusbiantoro, B., Samsita, P., & Jamil, A. (2015). Petunjuk Teknis: Identifikasi Beras Tidak Layak Konsumsi.

Hutagaol, N. A., Rumimpunu, F., & Baftim, F. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Konsumen Terhadap Perbedaan Label Harga Produk Dengan Bukti Transaksi Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999. Le Privatum, Vol.11 No.

Juliansyah, R. (2025). Polisi Gerebek Ruko Pengoplos Beras Premiun di Depok. TEMPO.

Maharani, A., & Dzikra, A. D. (2021). Fungsi Perlindungan Konsumen Dan Peran Lembaga Perlindungan Konsumen Di Indonesia : Perlindungan Konsumen Dan Pelaku Usaha (Literarure Review). Jurnal Ekonomi Manajamen Sistem Informasi, Vol.2. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31933/jemsi.v2i6

Marzuki, & Mahmud, P. (2024). Metode Penelitian Hukum (19 ed.). KENCANA.

Mewu, M. Y. S., & Hadewi, J. (2023). Perlindungan Konsumen Dalam Pembelian Produk Online: Analisis PErspektif Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen di Indonesia. Jurnal Kewarganegaraan, Vol.7 No.1.

Muhaimin. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Mataram University Press.

Rakyat, H. (2025). Geger! Beras Bulog Oplosan Berkedok Premium “Daun Suji” dan “Rinjani” Dibongkar di Depok.

Rama, A. (2025). Polres Metro Depok Ungkap Peredaran Oplosan : Pelaku Bisa Menjual 4 Ton Sehari, Begini Modusnya! Radar Depok.

Ramadhanty, D. A., & Huda, L. (2025). Polisi Tangkap Pengoplos Beras Premium Pakai Raskin di Depok. Kompas.com. https://megapolitan.kompas.com/read/2025/02/15/20461281/polisi-tangkap-pengoplos-beras-premium-pakai-raskin-di-depok

Simanjuntak, R. (2017). Prof, Ini Perbedaan Beras Dengan Menir. Republik Merdeka.

Sinaga, N. A., & Suisrudatin, N. (2014). PELAKSANAAN PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN DI INDONESIA. JURNAL ILMIAH HUKUM DIRGANTARA, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.35968/jh.v5i2.110

Sunggono, B. (2002). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen (1999).

Yogi Faisal. (2025). Polisi: 4 Ton Beras Oplosan Ludes Terjual Dalam Sehari. JPNN.com.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-21

How to Cite

Elvira Clarista Faiqah, Rodhia Tammardhiah, Qian Ramadhani, & Vincent Anderson Simanjuntak. (2025). Analisis Pelanggaran Hak Konsumen terhadap Kasus Pengoplosan Beras Merek Daun Suji. Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik Dan Negara, 2(3), 161–169. https://doi.org/10.62383/hukum.v2i3.284

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.