Penerapan Konsep CO-PRODUCTION dalam Pelayanan Publik di Kota Gorontalo
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/perspektif.v3i2.982Keywords:
Accountability, Co-Production, Digitalization, Effectiveness, ParticipationAbstract
This research specifically examines how the involvement of the community in the process of digitizing services at the population and civil registration office of Gorontalo City. Co-production is a collaboration between the government and the community to improve the quality, effectiveness, and satisfaction of services. The main problems in this study are the low participation of the community in population administration and challenges in the efficiency of services and the use of digital technology. The method used is qualitative descriptive through observation, interviews, and documentation. The results of the study show that co-production has been implemented through community involvement in data verification, the use of digital services, and active communication between officers and the community. However, there are still obstacles such as low digital literacy and limited human resources. In addition, technology infrastructure and internet access factors also affect the optimization of digital services. This study concludes that co-production is able to increase the effectiveness, responsiveness, and accountability of public services, although efforts are still needed to increase institutional capacity and community participation in a sustainable manner as well as a more inclusive digital education strategy.
Downloads
References
Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225
Bekkers, V., & Homburg, V. (2020). The information ecology of e-government. IOS Press.
Bovaird, T. (2007). Beyond engagement and participation: User and community coproduction of public services. Public Administration Review, 67(5), 846–860. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00773.x
Brandsen, T., & Honingh, M. (2016). Distinguishing different types of co-production: A conceptual analysis based on the role of professionals and citizens. Public Administration Review, 76(3), 427–435. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12465
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Denhardt, J. V., & Denhardt, R. B. (2003). The new public service: Serving, not steering. M.E. Sharpe.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2020). Innovative citizen participation and new democratic institutions: Catching the deliberative wave. OECD Publishing.
Osborne, S. P. (2021). Public service logic: Creating value for public service users, citizens, and society. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003009153
Ostrom, E. (1996). Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development. World Development, 24(6), 1073–1087. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(96)00023-X
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
United Nations. (2022). E-government survey 2022: The future of digital government. United Nations.
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
World Bank. (2021). GovTech maturity index: The state of public sector digital transformation. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/35745
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Perspektif Administrasi Publik dan hukum
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
