Analisis Yuridis Kekuatan Pembuktian Tangkapan Layar sebagai Alat Bukti Elektronik dalam Perkara Perceraian
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/perspektif.v3i2.981Keywords:
Electronic evidence, ITE Law, Judicial discretion, Law of evidence, ScreenshotAbstract
Digital evolution in the pattern of social interaction of the community also has a significant influence on the dynamics of the national judicial system. The transformation covers all judicial sectors, both religious and public, especially related to the technique of presenting evidence in the litigation process. This research is carried out with normative legal methods and is descriptive analytical. The author utilizes secondary data obtained through library search, which is then processed with qualitative normative analysis techniques. The legitimacy of screenshots as evidence has been explicitly regulated in applicable regulations. Referring to the renewal of the ITE Law in Law Number 1 of 2024, Article 5 paragraph (1) affirms that electronic information and its printed results are recognized as valid evidence before the law. This study shows that normatively, screenshots have a strong legal position in the civil system. However, in the reality of the trial, this instrument is positioned as a free evidence (vrij bewijs), which means that the weight of the evidence is not absolute and depends on the judge's evaluation and conviction.
Downloads
References
Acara, H. (n.d.). No Title.
Haerul, S., Sailellah, I., & Bajawa, P. N. (2025). Iblam Law Review.
Hal, B. A. B. I., & Tugas, M. (1941). No Title.
Hukum, J. I., & Alat, K. (2023). No Title. Unknown, 6(2), 207–216.
Imron, A., & Iqbal, M. (n.d.). Hukum pembuktian.
Juanda, E. (1998). Kekuatan alat bukti dalam perkara perdata menurut hukum positif Indonesia. 27–46.
Kedua, P. (2024). Elektronik dalam.
Kesha, R., N, A. K., Jafair, M. A. B., & Putri, R. C. (2026). Dalam hukum acara perdata Indonesia. Journal of Golden Generation Legal Science, 374–383.
Kurniawan, M. B. (2018). Equitable distribution of matrimonial property. 41–53.
Nunukan, P. N. (n.d.). Autentikasi alat bukti elektronik dalam memperlancar. Unknown, 12(2), 135–151.
Probolinggo, P. A. (2024). Putusan Pengadilan Agama.
Putusan, A. (2026). Kedudukan hukum tangkapan layar percakapan melalui aplikasi WhatsApp. Unknown, 5.
Romadiyah, S. N. (2021). Analisis jenis-jenis alat bukti dan kekuatan bukti digital dalam pembuktian acara perdata. Unknown, 4(2).
Taufiqoh, K. A., Rahmawati, D., & Joko, L. (2024). Keabsahan alat bukti elektronik dalam pembuktian perkara perdata. Unknown, 9, 150–160.
Verawati. (n.d.). Perdata.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Perspektif Administrasi Publik dan hukum

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



