Implementasi dan Modifikasi terhadap Pengakuan Asal-Usul Anak (Nasab) di Luar Nikah yang Sah Analisis Putusan Mk No.46/PUU-VIII/2010
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/perspektif.v2i1.215Keywords:
Constitutional Court Decision No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010, Implementation, Judge's Ratio Decidendi, ModificationAbstract
On February 17, 2012, the Constitutional Court granted the lawsuit filed by Hj. Aisyah Mochtar who filed a judicial review of Article 34 Paragraph (1) of Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage. This lawsuit arose from her marriage to Moerdiono in accordance with Islam which was not officially registered, which gave birth to a son, Iqbal Ramadhan. The Constitutional Court's decision changed the status of illegitimate children, who previously only had a civil relationship with the mother, now also have a civil relationship with the father and the father's family. This decision applies not only to children born from unregistered marriages, but also to children from relationships between men and women without the bonds of marriage which can be proven through technology such as DNA testing. These children are entitled to civil rights protection, such as maintenance and education, but are not related to guardianship issues. In its considerations, the Constitutional Court emphasized that the law must provide fair protection and legal certainty for the status of children, including those born even though their marriage is still disputed. Eliminating discrimination against illegitimate children aims to provide positive value for the future of children. The obligation of alimony that was previously only borne by the mother, is now shared with the father who can be proven to have a blood relationship with the child. If the father neglects to fulfill his obligations, he can be sued in court. The next question is how the Constitutional Court Decision will be implemented regarding the recognition of the lineage of children born outside of legal marriage.
Downloads
References
Asnawi, H. S. (2013). Politik hukum putusan MK No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010. Jurnal Status Anak Luar Kawin: Upaya Membongkar Positivisme Hukum Menuju Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM), 3(2), Juni.
Busman, E. (2016). Status anak luar nikah menurut hukum positif dan hukum Islam pasca keluarnya putusan MK tentang uji materiil undang-undang perkawinan. Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 1(2), 181-200. Retrieved from https://pa-purwodadi.go.id/index.php/26-halamandepan/artikel/210.Analisis-Maqaid-Asy-Syariah-Terhadap-Putusan-MK-NO.46-PUU-VIII-2010 (accessed August 31, 2024).
Dairani, D. (2021). Argumentasi hukum dan upaya mempertahankan eksistensi Pancasila sebagai sumber dari segala sumber hukum negara. HUKMY: Jurnal Hukum, 1(1), 19-34.
Dwinopianti, E. (2017). Implikasi dan akibat hukum putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 69/Puu-Xiii/2015 terhadap pembuatan akta perjanjian perkawinan setelah kawin yang dibuat di hadapan notaris (Tesis). Universitas Islam Indonesia.
Jurnal Konstitusi. (2015). The descendants of children outside of marriage after Constitutional Court decision No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010. Jurnal Konstitusi, 12(1), Maret.
Masri, E., & Wahyuni, S. (2021). Implementasi perjanjian perkawinan sebelum, saat, dan sesudah perkawinan. Jurnal Kajian Ilmiah, 21(1), 111-120.
Mursalin, A. (2023). Legalitas perkawinan beda agama: Mengungkap disparitas putusan pengadilan di Indonesia. Undang: Jurnal Hukum, 6(1), 113-150.
Nurcholis, M. (2019). Penyamaan batas usia perkawinan pria dan wanita perspektif Maqasid al-Usrah (Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 22/PUU-XV/2017). Mahakim: Journal of Islamic Family Law, 3(1), 1-18.
Rohman, M. (2017). Implikasi putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi nomor 69/PUU/XIII/2015 tentang perjanjian perkawinan terhadap tujuan perkawinan. Al-Daulah: Jurnal Hukum Dan Perundangan Islam, 7(1), 1-27.
Sembiring Meliala, D. (2015). Perkawinan beda agama dan penghayat kepercayaan di Indonesia pasca putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi.
Sunggono, B. (2016). Metodologi penelitian hukum. Raja Grafindo Persada.
