Strategi Komunikasi Digital Sistem Pengaduan Organisasi Publik dalam Membangun Kepercayaan Pelapor

Authors

  • Theresia Mona Simsen Banjarnahor Perbanas Institute
  • Easter B. U. Tobing Perbanas Institute

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/komunikasi.v3i4.1244

Keywords:

Complainant Trust, Digital Communication, Public Complaints, SPD-X, Strategic Communication

Abstract

The digitalization of complaint channels does not automatically increase complainants’ trust. This study aims to summarize digital communication factors that can shape complainants’ trust and conceptually apply them to the Digital Complaint System of Public Organization X (SPD-X). The study employs an integrative literature review of scientific articles published from 2018 to 2026 through Google Scholar, Crossref, and official publisher websites, as well as publicly available documents to understand the organizational context. The literature was selected based on its relevance to strategic communication, trust in digital government, complaint mechanisms, responsiveness, transparency, psychological safety, and communication evaluation. The review identified five factors that shape complainants’ trust: security and protection, process clarity, responsiveness and feedback, responsible transparency, and evidence of follow-up actions. Publicly available information indicates that SPD-X has several supporting foundations; however, it is insufficient to demonstrate increased complainants’ trust. This study proposes the “Safe–Clear–Trackable–Followed Up” strategy through complainant segmentation, a message house, notifications at each stage of complaint handling, and output–outtake–outcome–impact evaluation. The strategy encourages complaint channels to provide communication experiences that are safe, easy to understand, responsive, and evaluable. The study contributes by integrating strategic communication and digital government literature into a framework that can be tested without using complaint data that are not publicly available.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alessandro, M., Cardinale Lagomarsino, B., Scartascini, C., Streb, J., & Torrealday, J. (2021). Transparency and trust in government: Evidence from a survey experiment. World Development, 138, Article 105223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105223

AlYahya, S., & Alsaif, A. (2026). Empower: A unified platform for reporting quality assurance issues in digital government. SAGE Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440261423762

Alzahrani, L., Al-Karaghouli, W., & Weerakkody, V. (2017). Analysing the critical factors influencing trust in e-government adoption from citizens' perspective: A systematic review and a conceptual framework. International Business Review, 26(1), 164–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2016.06.004

AMEC. (2020). Barcelona Principles 3.0. International Association for the Measurement and Evaluation of Communication. https://amecorg.com/2020/07/barcelona-principles-3-0/

Antari, N. P. B. W. (2020). Penguatan whistleblowing system di Indonesia: Studi kasus whistleblowing system di Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia. Public Inspiration: Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 5(2), 158–167.

Cornelissen, J. (2020). Corporate communication: A guide to theory and practice (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Edmondson, A. C., & Bransby, D. P. (2023). Psychological safety comes of age: Observed themes in an established literature. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10, 55–78. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-055217

Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x

Fifaliana, R. M. (2026). A systematic literature review of empirical research on the impact of e-government use on citizens' trust in government. Chinese Public Administration Review, 17(3), 201–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/15396754251413048

Filiz, M. (2025). The mediating role of psychological safety in the effect of organisational cynicism on whistleblowing. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 39(8), 1969–1981. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-10-2024-0427

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.

Hardini, I. R., Nandika, R. S., Hamdi, H., & Eka Putri, S. A. (2024). Open government through public complaint management: Success stories from the Jakarta Provincial Government. eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government, 16(1), 130–167. https://doi.org/10.29379/jedem.v16i1.882

Hartanto, D., Dalle, J., Akrim, A., & Anisah, H. U. (2021). Perceived effectiveness of e-governance as an underlying mechanism between good governance and public trust: A case of Indonesia. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 23(6), 598–616. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPRG-03-2021-0046

Heath, R. L., & Johansen, W. (Eds.). (2020). The international encyclopedia of strategic communication. Wiley-Blackwell.

Hossain, N., Joshi, A., & Pande, S. (2024). The politics of complaint: A review of the literature on grievance redress mechanisms in the Global South. Policy Studies, 45(2), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2023.2193387

Morrison, E. W. (2023). Employee voice and silence: Taking stock a decade later. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10, 79–107. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-054654

Nurlinah, Ansar, M. C., & Chowdhury, K. (2025). Impact of government digital transformation on citizen trust and participation: Evidence from Gowa Regency, Indonesia. Frontiers in Human Dynamics, 7, Article 1700582. https://doi.org/10.3389/fhumd.2025.1700582

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Tsai, J.-Y. (2022). Examining response engagement in online interactions between US government agencies and citizens. Journal of Communication Management, 26(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-07-2021-0078

Villodre, J. (2025). A three-model approach to understand social media-mediated transparency in public administrations. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 91(1), 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523241261896

Wang, H. H., Cheng, E. W., Chen, X., & Liang, H. (2025). How institutionalized feedback works: Online citizen complaints and local government responsiveness in China. Governance, 38(2), Article e12907. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12907

Wirtz, B. W., Weyerer, J. C., & Rösch, M. (2018). Citizen and open government: An empirical analysis of antecedents of open government data. International Journal of Public Administration, 41(4), 308–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2016.1263659

Zerfass, A., Verčič, D., Nothhaft, H., & Werder, K. P. (2018). Strategic communication: Defining the field and its contribution to research and practice. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 12(4), 487–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2018.1493485

Downloads

Published

2026-09-27

How to Cite

Theresia Mona Simsen Banjarnahor, & Easter B. U. Tobing. (2026). Strategi Komunikasi Digital Sistem Pengaduan Organisasi Publik dalam Membangun Kepercayaan Pelapor. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, Administrasi Publik Dan Kebijakan Negara, 3(4), 170–188. https://doi.org/10.62383/komunikasi.v3i4.1244

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.