Sinkronisasi Kebijakan Pemerintah Pusat dan Daerah dalam Penanganan Kemiskinan Ekstrem
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/studi.v3i1.899Keywords:
Central Government, Extreme Poverty, Local Government, Policy Synchronization, Public PolicyAbstract
Extreme poverty represents a complex, multidimensional challenge in development that demands cohesive policy integration among various governmental tiers. The Indonesian government has established goals to expedite the eradication of extreme poverty via diverse national frameworks and initiatives, yet their success hinges on the extent of alignment between central and regional policies in areas such as strategic planning, financial allocation, and program execution. This research seeks to examine the patterns of policy alignment between central and local authorities, pinpoint the obstacles encountered during execution, and develop recommendations for enhancing collaborative efforts in tackling extreme poverty. Employing a qualitative descriptive methodology, data collection involved reviewing policy documents and development plans, complemented by discussions with relevant stakeholders at the regional level. The outcomes reveal that efforts toward policy synchronization have been made by merging national and local planning frameworks and initiatives, although persistent issues persist, such as inconsistencies in poverty statistics, jurisdictional overlaps among sectors, and inadequate inter-institutional cooperation. These insights imply that effective reduction of extreme poverty necessitates reinforced strategies for policy alignment, unified data platforms, and the adoption of cross-level and cross-sector partnership models to guarantee that measures are precisely directed, enduring, and impactful in diminishing the population affected by extreme poverty.
Downloads
References
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2025a). Membaca garis kemiskinan antara standar global dan realitas Indonesia. Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Jakarta Utara.
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2025b). Persentase penduduk miskin Maret 2025 turun menjadi 8,47 persen. Badan Pusat Statistik.
Hasim, D. (2023). Patologi birokrasi dalam pelayanan publik. Jurnal Governance and Politics (JGP), 3(1), 1–15.
Hilmy Nurfaizan Abdul Matin, Darmawan, C., Bestari, P., & Syaifullah. (2025). Civic governance and good governance: Dinamika kebijakan desentralisasi pendidikan di era otonomi daerah. Integralistik, 36(1).
https://doi.org/10.15294/j473yx66
Instruksi Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 4 Tahun 2022 tentang percepatan penghapusan kemiskinan ekstrem. (2022). Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan.
Ngambut, K. (2023). Kerangka kerja collaborative governance: Tantangan implementasi dalam situasi krisis pandemi COVID-19. Jurnal Administrasi dan Demokrasi, 2(1), 41–59.
Nurainun, & Kustiwa, O. (2022). Penyelenggaraan pelayanan perizinan berusaha berbasis risiko di pemerintah daerah. Jurnal Sosio-Komunika, 1(1), 12–29.
https://doi.org/10.57036/jsk.v1i1.13
Nurhadrayani Yani. (2020). Memahami konsep e-governance serta hubungan dengan e-government. Seminar Nasional Informatika, 2, F112.
Nursalam. (2016). Metode penelitian. Salemba Medika.
Pontuschka, R., de Castro Oriol, E., Martins, H. F., & Salazar, S. M. (2025). Exclusion errors in the Bolsa Família program: A systematic review of the literature. SAGE Open, 15(4).
https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251387832
Pramana, G. M. A., Nurkumalawati, I., & Arifin, R. (2022). Evaluasi kebijakan cap elektronik keimigrasian, data biometrik, dan mesin autogate dalam konsep geopolitik. Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum, 16(3), 457–478.
https://doi.org/10.30641/kebijakan.2022.V16.41-60
Ramadhani, & Rosadi, O. (2024). Relevansi keanggotaan ketua Pengadilan Negeri Pasaman Barat sebagai anggota forum koordinasi pimpinan daerah. Unes Journal of Swara Justisia, 8(2), 441–454.
https://doi.org/10.31933/yhgjtn17
Riyandi Firdaus, M., Noor, M., & Suparti, H. (2025). Public–private partnership in the implementation of corporate social responsibility programs. PubBis: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Penelitian Administrasi Publik dan Administrasi Bisnis, 9(2), 198–215.
https://doi.org/10.35722/jurnalpubbis.v9i2.1296
Roziqin, R., Syahrizal, S., & Koyansow, R. T. (2024). Sistem desentralisasi dalam penyelenggaraan pemerintahan daerah. Journal de Facto, 10(2), 175–192.
https://doi.org/10.36277/jurnaldefacto.v10i2.188
Sari, P. (2023). Perencanaan pembangunan di Indonesia. Pusat Studi Perencanaan Pembangunan Regional.
Sinaga, S. C., & Mailin, M. (2023). Pengaruh aplikasi TikTok terhadap perubahan gaya hidup dan pola pikir masyarakat. Al Qalam: Jurnal Ilmiah Keagamaan dan Kemasyarakatan, 17(5), 3426–3435.
https://doi.org/10.35931/aq.v17i5.2744
Situmorang, S. (2020). Kebijakan publik: Teori, analisis, implementasi, dan evaluasi kebijakan. TheJournalish: Social and Government, 1(1), 33–37.
Sugiyono. (2023). Metode penelitian. Alfabeta.
Sutikno, C., Pribadi, I. A. P., Atika, Z. R., & Amanda, A. (2023). Implementasi kebijakan Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH). Musamus Journal of Public Administration, 5(2), 267–280.
https://doi.org/10.35724/mjpa.v5i2.5034
Taufiq, N. (2022). Penciri kemiskinan ekstrem di 35 kabupaten prioritas. Seminar Nasional Official Statistics, 2022(1), 895–904.
https://doi.org/10.34123/semnasoffstat.v2022i1.1258
Yahya, H., & Sudarmo, S. (2022). Collaborative governance dalam program EPPSON sebagai perwujudan smart city. Wacana Publik, 2(1), 239–250.
https://doi.org/10.20961/wp.v2i1.63278
Zulfikar, R., Sari, F. P., Fatmayati, A., Wandini, K., Haryati, T., Jumini, S., Nurjanah, N., Annisa, S., Kusumawardhani, O. B., Mutiah, R., Linggi, A. I., & Fadilah, H. (2024). Metode penelitian kuantitatif: Teori, metode, dan praktik.
