Pengambilan Keputusan dalam Kondisi Ketidakpastian : Tinjauan Sistematis atas Pendekatan Risiko dan Probabilitas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/perspektif.v3i1.941Keywords:
Decision Making, Expected Utility Theory, Probability, Prospect Theory, RiskAbstract
Decision-making under uncertainty is a major challenge in management, economics, and public policy, where outcomes cannot be accurately predicted due to limited information and environmental dynamics. This article conducts a systematic literature review of risk and probability approaches to decision-making under uncertainty, focusing on rational theory synthesis (such as expected utility theory, decision tree analysis, and Bayesian decision theory) and behavioral perspectives (prospect theory and heuristics). The review covers reputable literature from the last ten years to the present. The results show that the probabilistic approach provides a strong and adaptive rational framework, but has significant limitations due to cognitive biases such as loss aversion, overconfidence, and ambiguity aversion, which cause deviations from normative rationality. The integration of rational approaches with behavioral elements, through hybrid models, has proven to be more comprehensive and realistic for dealing with true uncertainty (Knightian uncertainty). These findings emphasize the need for a multidimensional decision-making paradigm in organizational and policy practices.
Downloads
References
Acciarini, C., Brunetta, F., & Boccardelli, P. (2021). Cognitive biases and decision-making strategies in times of change: A systematic literature review. Management Decision, 59(3), 638–652. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-07-2019-1006
Alen-Savikko, A. (2022). Rational choice: A normative concept (pp. 63–78). https://doi.org/10.4337/9781802204896.00008
Alhajjar, M., Alkaabi, M. A., Almemari, M. M., Alhassani, M. A., Alkaabi, N. K., Alshamsi, S. A., & AlBlooshi, H. H. (2021). A bibliometric analysis of objective and subjective risk. Risks, 9(7), 128. https://doi.org/10.3390/RISKS9070128
Aven, T. (2023). On the gap between theory and practice in defining and understanding risk. Safety Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106325
Awan, M. A., & Saeed, A. (2022). Decision-making under uncertainty: A systematic review of decision theory approaches. Journal of Decision Systems, 31(2), 114–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2022.2075481
Bai, S., Fedulova, I., & Drozdova, Y. (2023). Management decision-making: Multi-criterion assessment of uncertainty. Fìnansovo-Kreditna Dìâlʹnìstʹ: Problemi Teorìï Ta Praktiki. https://doi.org/10.55643/fcaptp.4.51.2023.4066
Blavatskyy, P. R. (2021). A measure of ambiguity (Knightian uncertainty). Theory and Decision, 91(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11238-020-09798-6
Green, M. T., & Tan, C. S. (2021). Behavioral economics and decision-making: Integrating psychological insights with probabilistic models. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 34(4), 388–402. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2235
Keller, A. B., & Tufano, P. (2020). The limitations of classical probability in decision-making: A critical review. Decision Analysis, 17(3), 205–220. https://doi.org/10.1287/deca.2020.0386
Luhmann, C. P., & Singer, T. (2023). Risk perception and decision-making: A behavioral approach to uncertainty. Risk Analysis, 43(1), 65–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13765
Pathak, S., Dewangan, R. L., & Mohanty, S. N. (2021). Decision making under uncertainty and problem solving. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66869-3_1
Rizzo, M. J., & Dold, M. F. (2021). Knightian uncertainty: Through a Jamesian window. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 45(5), 967–988. https://doi.org/10.1093/CJE/BEAB011
Uzhga-Rebrov, O., & Kuleshova, G. (2022). Probability weighting in decision-making tasks under risk. Information Technology and Management Science, 25, 49–54. https://doi.org/10.7250/itms-2022-0006
Zhang, Y., & Xu, Z. (2021). An overview of studies based on the probability-based decision-making information: Current developments, methodologies, applications and challenges. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40815-021-01148-0
Nobanee, H., Alhajjar, M., Alkaabi, M. A., Almemari, M. M., Alhassani, M. A., Alkaabi, N. K., Alshamsi, S. A., & AlBlooshi, H. H. (2021). A bibliometric analysis of objective and subjective risk. Risks, 9(7), 128. https://doi.org/10.3390/RISKS9070128
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Perspektif Administrasi Publik dan hukum

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


