Accountability of Budget Management of the Regional Secretariat of Maybrat Regency, West Papua
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/hukum.v2i2.192Keywords:
Accountability, Budget, ManagementAbstract
This study aims to describe and analyze: Accountability of budget management of the Maybrat district secretariat and inhibiting factors of accountability of the budget management of the Maybrat district regional secretariat. The research is a qualitative descriptive analysis. The data analysis technique uses a technique developed by McNabb (2002), namely Grouping the data according to key constructs, identifying bases for interpretation, developing generalizations from the data, Testing Alternative interpretations and Forming and/or refining generalizable theory from case study. The results of the study show that the Budget Preparation Procedure of the Maybrat Regency Regional Secretariat is carried out by a budget team that is prepared and implemented for a period of one year. The stages of the budget preparation system start from the guidelines of the SEKDA Work Plan that has been determined using the mixed preparation method (Top Down and Bottom Up). The evaluation process of planning the operational cost budget at the Maybrat Regency Regional Secretariat begins with an evaluation of the budget preparation process schedule guided by Permendagri No. 13 of 2006 and Permendagri No. 59 of 2007. The implementation and administration of the budget at the Maybrat Regency Regional Secretariat is carried out by the Treasurer of the Maybrat Regency Regional Secretariat through recording by the treasurer using general cash books, tax assistant cash books and bank books. The evaluation of the budget financial statements refers to Permendagri No. 113 of 2014 where the Treasurer of the Maybrat Regency Regional Secretariat submits a report on the realization of the implementation of the Budget to the Regional Secretary in the form of a budget realization report. Obstacles Faced in the Accountability of Budget Management of the Maybrat Regency Regional Secretariat include the Low Quality of Human Resources. In addition, the lack of information system facilities related to the financial reporting system is rarely updated or updated.
Downloads
References
Adisasmita, R. (2010). Pengelolaan Pendapatan dan Anggaran Daerah. Yogyakarta : Graha Ilmu
Bastian, I. (2010). Akuntansi Sektor Publik Suatu Pengantar Edisi Ketiga. Jakarta: Erlangga
Hulme, D dan Turner, M..(1997). Governance, Administration and Development: Making The State Work. London:Macmillan Press
Lembaga Administrasi Negara dan Badan Pengawasan Keuangan dan Pembangunan RI (2000). Akuntabilitas dan Good Governance, Modul 1-5, Modul Sosialisasi Sistem Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah (AKIP), LAN BPKP RI, Jakarta
McNabb, D.E. (2002). Research Method in Public Administration and Nonprofit Management, Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. ME,
Maries, N.K., Herawati, N.T dan Sinarwati, N.K (2017) Menelaah Transparansi Dan Akuntabilitas Pengelolaan Keuangan Pada Yayasan Pendidikan Full Day Mardlatillah Singaraja. JIMAT : Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Akuntansi Undiksha. 7( 1) 2-15,
Mardiasmo. (2002). Otonomi dan Manajemen Keuangan Daerah. Yogyakarta : Andim
Mardiasmo. (2012). Akuntansi Sektor Publik. Yogyakata:Andi offset.
Mardiasmo. (2018). Otonomi dan Manajemen Keuangan Daerah. Yogyakarta: CV. Andi Offset
Nafidah, L.N. dan Suryaningtyas, M. (2015). Akuntabilitas Pengelolaan Alokasi Dana Desa dalam Upaya Meningkatkan Pembangunan dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat. Bisnis. 3(1), 213-239. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21043/bisnis.v3i1.1480
Nordiawan, D. (2006), Akuntansi Sektor Publik. Jakarta: Salemba Empat
Nurlan, D. (2008). Akuntansi Keuangan Daerah (Akuntansi Sektor Publik). Jakarta: PT. INDEKS.
Raba, M. (2006). Akuntabilitas Konsep dan Implementasi. Malang : UMM Press
