Analisis Literatur Tentang Kerangka Pengukuran Kinerja dan Akuntabilitas dalam Pengiriman Layanan Publik

Authors

  • Permata Pebester Natalia Hutahaean Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji
  • Hamdani Dahyufi Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji
  • Andriansah Andriansah Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/studi.v2i4.772

Keywords:

Evaluation Frameworks, Performance Measurement, Public Accountability, Public Administration, Public Service Delivery

Abstract

This study analyzes performance measurement frameworks and accountability mechanisms in public service delivery through a comprehensive literature review of studies published between 2015 and 2025. Although models such as the 3E (economy, efficiency, effectiveness) and IOO (input–output–outcome) frameworks are widely used in public administration, evidence indicates that their implementation often falls short due to data limitations, bureaucratic resistance, and limited utilization of performance results in decision-making. The literature also highlights a persistent gap between theoretical performance frameworks and actual public service practices, particularly in capturing service quality and meaningful outcomes for citizens. Recent studies emphasize that citizen satisfaction and public perception are essential indicators that must be integrated into contemporary performance measurement systems. This study concludes that performance measurement and accountability are interdependent mechanisms that require strengthened organizational capacity, relevant indicators, and a culture of evidence-based improvement to enhance public service quality.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Behn, R. D. (2003). Why measure performance? Different purposes require different measures. Public Administration Review, 63(5), 586–606. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6210.00322

Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x

Boyne, G. A. (2002). Concepts and indicators of local authority performance: An evaluation of the statutory frameworks in England and Wales. Public Money & Management, 22(2), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9302.00302

Brajer-Marczak, R. (2020). Review of selected performance measurement models used in public administration. Administrative Sciences, 10(4), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci10040096

Halligan, J., Bouckaert, G., & Van Dooren, W. (2015). Performance management in the public sector. In Performance management systems: A global perspective (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Hasibuan, Z., Saputro, F. B., Hasibuan, S. S., Meidiyustiani, R., & Fakultas Ekonomi. (2025). Literatur review: Pengukuran kinerja sektor publik. Jurnal Manajemen dan Akuntansi, 2(4), 220–224.

Hidayat, P., & Sutikno, B. (2025). Akuntabilitas kinerja pelayanan publik pada Kantor Kecamatan Gading Cempaka Kota Bengkulu. Jurnal STIA Bengkulu, 11(1), 45–56.

Hilmawan, R., Aprianti, Y., Yudaruddin, R., Anggraini, R. F., Fitrianto, Y., & Wahyuningsih, N. (2023). Public sector innovation in local government and its impact on development outcomes: Empirical evidence in Indonesia. Heliyon, 9(12), e22833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22833

Hondeghem, A., & Vandenabeele, W. (2007). The new public service: Serving, not steering. In J. Rabin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of public administration and public policy (2nd ed.). M. E. Sharpe.

Hood, C. (1995). The “new public management” in the 1980s: Variations on a theme. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20(2–3), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(93)E0001-W

Jacob, J., Latupeirissa, P., Dewi, N. L. Y., Prayana, I. K. R., & Srikandi, M. B. (2024). Transforming public service delivery: A comprehensive review of digitization initiatives. Sustainability, 16(7), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16072845

Michael, A. (2015). Armstrong’s handbook of performance management: An evidence-based guide to delivering high performance. Kogan Page.

Osborne, S. P. (2010). The new public governance? Emerging perspectives on the theory and practice of public governance. Routledge.

Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2017). Public management reform: A comparative analysis—Into the age of austerity (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Shahzada, N., Panezai, S., & Kakar, A. K. (2024). Citizen satisfaction with municipal services: A meta-analysis. Journal of Geography and Regional Future Studies, 1(3), 64–80.

Speklé, R. F., & Verbeeten, F. H. M. (2014). The use of performance measurement systems in the public sector: Effects on performance. Management Accounting Research, 25(2), 131–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2013.07.004

Ulin, T. T., & Aisyah, S. (2023). Akuntabilitas kinerja pelayanan publik dalam pembuatan KTP-el pada Dinas Kependudukan dan Pencatatan Sipil Kota Medan. Jurnal Minfo Polgan, 12(2), 1946–1952.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-30

How to Cite

Permata Pebester Natalia Hutahaean, Hamdani Dahyufi, & Andriansah Andriansah. (2025). Analisis Literatur Tentang Kerangka Pengukuran Kinerja dan Akuntabilitas dalam Pengiriman Layanan Publik. Studi Administrasi Publik Dan Ilmu Komunikasi, 2(4), 112–122. https://doi.org/10.62383/studi.v2i4.772

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.