Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pemegang Surat Utang Negara Atas Risiko Gagal Bayar (Default)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/perspektif.v2i1.106Keywords:
Government Debt Instruments, Bonds, DefaultAbstract
Public enthusiasm for government bonds is high due to the view that such investments are considered more saving and promising. In 1950 the government issued ORI with interest of 3% per year, but the bonds failed to pay because the government at that time did not have enough money so that many investors holding bonds as Government Debt Instruments experienced losses. In this research, a juridical analysis of the position of the parties in Government Debt Instruments (SUN) was carried out and an analysis of the form of legal protection for holders of Government Debt Instruments (SUN) in the risk of default provided by the government. The research method used in writing this law is normative juridical, with a statutory approach. There are findings that installments of principal and interest on state debt securities will be included as expenditure items in the APBN each year. In the event that the risk of default does not sever the civil relationship between the SUN Issuer and the SUN holder as an Investor in a civil relationship, investors who suffer losses based on their civil rights can file a lawsuit for default due to the risk of default.
Downloads
References
Ang, R. (1997). Buku pintar pasar modal Indonesia. Mediasoft Indonesia.
Badan Pengawas Pasar Modal. (2005). Studi tentang perwaliamanatan di pasar modal Indonesia. Departemen Keuangan RI.
Dewi, A. H. S. M. (2022). Perlindungan hukum terhadap pemegang obligasi dalam pasar modal atas perbuatan melawan hukum yang dilakukan wali amanat ditinjau dari perspektif hukum investasi dan pasar modal. Jurnal Dinamika, 28(10), July.
Harahap, M. Y. (1986). Segi-segi hukum perjanjian (2nd ed.). Alumni.
HR, R. (2011). Hukum administrasi negara (Revised ed.). Rajawali Press.
Juwana, H. (2002). Hukum ekonomi dan hukum internasional (1st print). Lentera Hati.
Khairandy, R. (2010). Hukum pasar modal I (1st print). FH UII Press.
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata.
Komara, I. A. (2019). Analisis yuridis terhadap pemegang obligasi lama yang telah daluwarsa. Diponegoro Law Journal, 8(2).
Mertokusumo, S. (2001). Penemuan hukum: Sebuah pengantar (2nd ed.). Liberty.
Rahardjo, S. (2003). Panduan investasi obligasi. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Retnadi, D., et al. (2005). Obligasi rekapitulasi perbankan: Geneologi, masalah, dan solusi. Masyarakat Profesional Madani.
Sari, E. K., & Simanungsong, A. (2008). Hukum dalam ekonomi (2nd ed.). Grasindo.
Satrio. (1999). Cessie, subrogatie, novatie, kompensatie & percampuran hutang (2nd ed.). Alumni.
Soepraptomo, H. (2004). Segi-segi hukum obligasi. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis, 23(I).
Subekti. (1995). Aneka perjanjian (10th ed.). Citra Aditya Bakti.
Sulistyastuti, D. R. (2002). Saham dan obligasi: Ringkasan teori dan soal jawab. UAJY.
Sutedi, A. (2009). Aspek hukum obligasi dan sukuk. Sinar Grafika.
Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2002 tentang Surat Utang Negara (SUN).
Widjaja, G., & Jono. (2006). Penerbitan obligasi dan peran serta tanggung jawab wali amanat dalam pasar modal (1st ed., 1st print). Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Yudhistira, N. (2023). Hapusnya hak tagih pemegang obligasi lama terhadap negara ditinjau dari UU Perbendaharaan Indonesia / Indische Comptabiliteitswet (ICW). Review Unes, 6(1), September.
