The Impact of Authenticity in Key Opinion Leaders Branding Communication

Isti Budhi Setiawati; L.M. Novrianto

doi:10.62383/dialogika.v1i3.590

Authors

Isti Budhi Setiawati Universitas Ary Ginanjar. Indonesia
L.M. Novrianto Universitas Ary Ginanjar. Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/dialogika.v1i3.590

Keywords:

Data, Education, Literacy, Loans, Students

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the role of authenticity in branding communication conducted by Key Opinion Leaders (KOLs) and its impact on consumer trust, emotional engagement, and brand loyalty. Employing a library research approach, data were collected from scholarly literature published between 2021 and 2025 relevant to authenticity, brand communication, and KOL-based marketing. The analysis reveals that authenticity serves as a key element linking brand values to positive audience perceptions, which subsequently influence brand equity and purchase intention. Furthermore, this research highlights that authenticity in digital marketing is not merely a rhetorical claim but a relational practice that shapes how consumers evaluate credibility and trustworthiness. Strategic communication practices such as narrative storytelling, transparent sponsorship disclosure, and value alignment significantly strengthen the credibility of both KOLs and the brands they represent. Authentic storytelling allows audiences to connect with the personal experiences of KOLs, thereby enhancing identification and fostering long-term engagement with the brand. However, this study also identifies several challenges in maintaining authenticity, including risks of over-commercialization, inconsistencies in message delivery, and misalignment between KOL identity and brand values. When audiences perceive exaggerated promotional tactics or lack of transparency, their trust can diminish, ultimately weakening brand loyalty. Therefore, the sustainability of authenticity requires continuous monitoring, adaptive strategies, and consistent ethical practices in brand communication. The findings affirm that authenticity is both a strategic differentiator and a fragile asset, requiring deliberate and sustained management in the competitive digital marketplace. By recognizing authenticity as a multidimensional construct—encompassing transparency, value congruence, and emotional resonance—brands and KOLs can collaboratively enhance audience engagement while preserving credibility. This research contributes to the development of more effective branding communication strategies through KOLs and offers practical guidance for marketers to navigate authenticity challenges in an era dominated by digital interactions and consumer skepticism.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Isti Budhi Setiawati, Universitas Ary Ginanjar. Indonesia

Department of Communication Sciences

L.M. Novrianto , Universitas Ary Ginanjar. Indonesia

Department of Communication Sciences

References

Alif Auladi, G., & Muwahid, F. (2025). Cybersecurity and moral responsibility: A philosophical-Islamic approach to digital trust. TechComp Innovations: Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 2(1), 53–65. https://doi.org/10.70063/techcompinnovations.v2i1.93

At Thur Jasson Cassidy, A., Fuad, A., & Ulil Abshor As Shofy, M. (2024). Emerging trends and challenges in digital crime: A study of cyber criminal tactics and countermeasures. TechComp Innovations: Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 1(1), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.70063/techcompinnovations.v1i1.25

Audrezet, A., de Kerviler, G., & Moulard, J. G. (2018). Authenticity under threat: When social media influencers need to go beyond self-presentation. Journal of Business Research, 117, 557–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.008

Beckman, T., Colucci, M., & Sivadas, E. (2022). Brand authenticity: Conceptualization, measurement, and outcomes. Journal of Business Research, 139, 1257–1267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.10.050

Bengtsson, M. (2022). How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. NursingPlus Open, 8, 100093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.npls.2022.100093

Beverland, M. B., & Farrelly, F. J. (2010). The quest for authenticity in consumption: Consumers’ purposive choice of authentic cues to shape experienced outcomes. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(5), 838–856. https://doi.org/10.1086/615047

Campbell, C., & Grimm, P. E. (2022). The challenges and opportunities of influencer marketing transparency. Journal of Advertising, 51(2), 203–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2021.2009471

Casaló, L. V., Flavián, C., & Ibáñez-Sánchez, S. (2018). Influencers on Instagram: Antecedents and consequences of opinion leadership. Journal of Business Research, 117, 510–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.005

Delmas, M. A., & Burbano, V. C. (2022). The drivers of greenwashing. California Management Review, 64(1), 34–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/00081256211073321

Djafarova, E., & Trofimenko, O. (2019). ‘Instafamous’ – credibility and self-presentation of micro-celebrities on social media. Information, Communication & Society, 22(10), 1432–1446. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1438491

Eggers, F., O’Dwyer, M., Kraus, S., Vallaster, C., & Güldenberg, S. (2022). Brand authenticity in marketing. European Journal of Marketing, 56(6), 1649–1674. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-03-2021-0205

Evans, N. J., Phua, J., Lim, J., & Jun, H. (2017). Disclosing Instagram influencer advertising: The effects of disclosure language on advertising recognition, attitudes, and behavioral intent. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 17(2), 138–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2017.1366885

Freberg, K., Graham, K., McGaughey, K., & Freberg, L. A. (2011). Who are the social media influencers? A study of public perceptions of personality. Public Relations Review, 37(1), 90–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2010.11.001

Jin, S. V., & Muqaddam, A. (2022). The impact of influencer–brand fit on authenticity perceptions. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 31(3), 345–360. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-04-2021-3432

Khairani, N., & Haris Muchtar, A. (2024). The influence of destination image and electronic word of mouth (E-WOM) on tourist’s intention to visit Keranggan Ecotourism Village. SocioHumania: Journal of Social Humanities Studies, 1(1), 01–08. https://doi.org/10.70063/sociohumania.v1i1.6

Ki, C. W. C., Cuevas, L. M., Chong, S. M., & Lim, H. (2020). Influencer marketing: Social media influencers as human brands attaching to followers and yielding positive marketing results by fulfilling needs. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 55, 102133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102133

Kowalczyk, C. M., & Pounders, K. (2023). Transforming brands through narrative authenticity. Journal of Brand Management, 30(5), 534–549. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41262-022-00301-7

Lee, J., & Choi, Y. (2024). The authenticity transfer effect in influencer marketing. International Journal of Advertising, 43(1), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2022.2059023

Machi, L. A., & McEvoy, B. T. (2021). The literature review: Six steps to success (4th ed.). Corwin.

Marwick, A. E. (2023). Authenticity in the age of influencer marketing. New Media & Society, 25(4), 987–1005. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221079120

Morhart, F. M., & Malär, L. (2023). The role of brand authenticity in consumer decision-making. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 33(1), 112–128. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1314

Napoli, J., Dickinson, S. J., Beverland, M. B., & Farrelly, F. (2014). Measuring consumer-based brand authenticity. Journal of Business Research, 67(6), 1090–1098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.06.001

Nguyen, B., & Simkin, L. (2024). Gen Z and authenticity in brand communications. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 32(2), 178–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254X.2022.2052022

Nur Ihsan Purwanto, A., Fauzan, M., Widya, T., & Syarof Azzaky, N. (2024). Ethical implications and challenges of AI implementation in business operations. TechComp Innovations: Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 1(2), 68–82. https://doi.org/10.70063/techcompinnovations.v1i2.52

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Rifqi Prasmanto, J., Ma’ruf, A., Fathurrahman Assidiq, M., & Faiz Diyaulhaq, M. (2025). Managing digital economic corridors: International cooperation and regional integration in the digital age. TechComp Innovations: Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 2(1), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.70063/techcompinnovations.v2i1.63

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2023). Self-determination theory in branding: Implications for consumer engagement. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 33(2), 245–260. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1327

Schouten, A. P., Janssen, L., & Verspaget, M. (2020). Celebrity vs. influencer endorsements in advertising: The role of identification, credibility, and product-endorser fit. International Journal of Advertising, 39(2), 258–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2019.1634898

Wang, X., & Li, Y. (2022). Influencer credibility and brand authenticity. Journal of Business Research, 146, 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.029

Zhang, L., & Watson, E. M. (2022). Conducting rigorous literature reviews: A methodological guide. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221109668