Algoritma, Buzzer, dan Viralitas Isu Agama: Studi tentang Polarisasi dalam Komunikasi Politik Islam
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/dialogika.v2i2.1057Keywords:
Algorithms, Buzzer, Islamic Political Communication, Media Literacy, ViralityAbstract
The development of digital technology has fundamentally transformed the practice of Islamic political communication, particularly through the emergence of algorithm-based social media. This article aims to analyse the interrelationship between media algorithms, the ‘buzzer’ phenomenon, and the virality of religious issues in shaping polarisation amongst the Muslim community. This research employs a qualitative approach using a literature review method, examining various recent literature in the fields of political communication, digital media, and Islamic studies. The findings indicate that social media algorithms are not neutral; rather, they reinforce users’ preferences through content selection mechanisms that have the potential to create echo chambers. In this context, ‘buzzers’ act as strategic actors who construct narratives and mobilise public opinion, whilst the virality of religious issues accelerates the spread of collective emotions that are often not balanced by information verification. These three factors simultaneously contribute to increasing social polarisation, the fragmentation of the Muslim community, and the weakening of the quality of religious discourse. This article emphasises the importance of media literacy and the internalisation of Islamic communication ethics as a means of mitigating the negative impacts of digital political communication.
Downloads
References
Ahmmad, M., Shahzad, K., Iqbal, A., & Latif, M. (2025). Trap of Social Media Algorithms: A Systematic Review of Research on Filter Bubbles, Echo Chambers, and Their Impact on Youth. Societies. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15110301
Amin, A. R. Al, Fahmi, M. Y., & Bariroh, L. (2024). The Political Economy of Buzzer Actor Networks in Text Production. The Sunan Ampel Review of Political and Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.15642/sarpass.2024.4.1.30-44
Florina, I. (2019). Literasi Media Baru di Kalangan Dosen Menaggapi Isu Politik dalam Pusaran Hoax dan Hate speech. ETTISAL : Journal of Communication. https://doi.org/10.21111/ettisal.v4i1.2821
Geschke, D., Lorenz, J., & Holtz, P. (2018). The triple‐filter bubble: Using agent‐based modelling to test a meta‐theoretical framework for the emergence of filter bubbles and echo chambers. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 58, 129–149. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12286
Goryacheva, О. (2021). Constructing media reality with an agenda in mind. Vestnik Universiteta. https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2021-9-151-155
Iannelli, G., De Marzo, G., & Castellano, C. (2022). Filter bubble effect in the multistate voter model. Chaos, 32 4, 43103. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0079135
Istiqomah, S. N., Amin, M. N., & Ikhwanudin, M. (2025). Pandangan Al-Qur’an Terhadap Hoaks Persepektif Tafsir Maqāṣidī (Studi Q.S. Al-Ḥujurāt: 6 dan al-Nūr: 15). Journal of Islamic Scriptures in Non-Arabic Societies. https://doi.org/10.51214/jisnas.v2i1.949
Karman, Hamad, I., & Rusadi, U. (2023). Commodification of instrumental Islamic piety in Indonesian political contestation 2019. Asian Journal of Communication, 34, 265–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2023.2295871
Masruha, M., Munawar, S., Zulmi, F., Abdullah, A., & Husaini, H. (2025). Digitization of Fatwas and Religious Authority: A Study on the Role of Social Media in the Interpretation of Islamic Law. Journal of Mujaddid Nusantara. https://doi.org/10.62568/jomn.v2i2.421
Rohid, N., Sugihartati, R., Suyanto, B., Susilo, D., & Zikri, A. (2025). Digital Activism in Contemporary Islamic Politics: A Critical Analysis of Social Media’s Impact on Islamic Movements. MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review. https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v4i1.10159
Rosyadi, M., & Eriyanto, E. (2019). The Influence of the Social Media Recommendation System Against Polarization in the Views of User Politics: Experiments on Social Media Newsfeed on Social Media Users. Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 1st Sampoerna University-AFBE International Conference, SU-AFBE 2018, 6-7 December 2018, Jakarta Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.6-12-2018.2286272
Scheufele, D., & Tewksbury, D. (2007). Framing, Agenda Setting, and Priming: The Evolution of Three Media Effects Models. Journal of Communication, 57, 9–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9916.2007.00326.x
Sholikhah, Z., As-Syafi’i, R. P., & Sutiah. (2025). Implementasi Literasi Digital Dalam pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam Di Madrasah. Jurnal Mu’allim. https://doi.org/10.35891/muallim.v7i1.5249
Solahudin, D., & Fakhruroji, M. (2019). Internet and Islamic Learning Practices in Indonesia: Social Media, Religious Populism, and Religious Authority. Religions. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel11010019
Yigit, Ö. (2025). Shifts in Religious Instrumentalization: Friday Sermons and Ethnic Conflict in Turkey. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 31, 357–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/13537113.2025.2458572
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dialogika : Jurnal Penelitian Komunikasi dan Sosialisasi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



