Dampak Gerakan Literasi terhadap Pemahaman Berbahasa di Kalangan Mahasiswa KPI Universitas Islam Bandung
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/komunikasi.v2i1.143Keywords:
Literacy Movements, Language Comprehension, KPI Students, Universitas Islam Bandung, Digital LiteracyAbstract
This study aims to analyze the impact of literacy movements on language comprehension among students of the Islamic Communication and Broadcasting Program (KPI) at Universitas Islam Bandung. Using a qualitative approach with a descriptive design, the research explores the implementation of literacy movements, their influence on reading, writing, and speaking skills, as well as challenges faced by students. The findings show that literacy movements significantly enhance students’ language comprehension, both in academic and da’wah contexts. Identified challenges include low motivation, limited time, and inadequate supporting facilities. Proposed solutions include integrating literacy into courses, developing facilities, and implementing digital literacy programs. These findings are expected to serve as a reference for strengthening literacy movements in higher education.
Downloads
References
Arifin, Z. (2017). Peningkatan Literasi di Perguruan Tinggi: Tantangan dan Solusi. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 3(2), 101-115.
Aziz, A., & Mufidah, Z. (2019). Implementasi Program Literasi di Perguruan Tinggi. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 6(3), 213-228.
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Doubleday.
Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Harvard University Press.
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Journal of Linguistic Theory, 1(1), 1-56.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. Edward Arnold Publishers.
Haris, M. I. (2020). Pengaruh Gerakan Literasi Sekolah Terhadap Kemampuan Berbahasa Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 5(2), 98-112.
Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. Sociolinguistics: Selected Readings, 269-293. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Isnaini, H., Puspita, D. L., Suantini, K., Susanti, Y. R., Baehaqie, I., S., D. H. H., . . . Yuliasih, N. (2023). Filsafat Pendidikan Bahasa. Wajo, Sulawesi Selatan: Penerbit Logika.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.
McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176-187.
Piaget, J. (1977). The development of thought: Equilibration of cognitive structures. Viking Press.
Pratama, A. (2019). Evaluasi implementasi program literasi di perguruan tinggi. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 8(3), 234-245.
Rahayu, S. (2021). Peran Literasi Informasi Dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Mahasiswa. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 7(1), 45-60.
Schramm, W. (1954). The process and effects of mass communication. University of Illinois Press.
Suryanto, S., & Wati, S. (2020). Penguatan literasi digital bagi mahasiswa di era industri 4.0. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 22(1), 1-12.
UNESCO (2006). Education for All Global Monitoring Report.
