Respon Publik Terhadap Kasus Seunghan RIIZE: Analisis Reputasi SM Entertainment Melalui Komentar Netizen di Platform Digital

Authors

  • Adriana Airlia Yusrin Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika
  • Maya May Syarah Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika
  • Herman Herman Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/dialogika.v1i2.466

Keywords:

Public Opinion, Digital Reputation, Social Media, Crisis Communication, SM Entertainment

Abstract

The case involving Seunghan from RIIZE drew widespread attention on social media, particularly on platform X, and triggered various public responses toward SM Entertainment. This study aims to analyze public perceptions of SM Entertainment's reputation through netizen comments on digital platforms. Employing a qualitative approach and participatory observation method, the research examines 15 viral posts made by netizens related to the case. Findings reveal that public opinion is significantly shaped by the pseudo-environment formed on social media. Criticism of SM’s crisis management, disappointment among the fandom, and allegations of supporting bullying emerged as dominant themes. These results highlight the importance of transparency, speed, and social sensitivity in crisis communication in the digital era. The study recommends that entertainment agencies respond more strategically to public opinion in order to preserve their reputation in virtual spaces.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aisyah, R., & Hasfi, N. (2022). Opini publik di era media sosial. Jurnal Komunikasi Publik, 8(1), 88–97.

Alfifa, N., et al. (2025). Pembentukan opini publik melalui media sosial. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi Digital, 7(1), 55–66.

Alya, M. (2025). Peran media sosial dalam interaksi penggemar K-Pop di Indonesia. Jurnal Media Digital, 4(1), 25–34.

Ana Widiyawati, & Ahmad Toni. (2024). Analisis komunikasi krisis SM Entertainment dalam kasus Lucas NCT. Jurnal Media Korea, 2(3), 45–60.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). Sage.

Fitri, N., et al. (2021). Komunikasi krisis di era digital. Jurnal Komunikasi Kontemporer, 9(2), 111–123.

Gaspersz, V., et al. (2024). Pengaruh influencer terhadap opini publik. Jurnal Marketing Digital, 5(1), 77–89.

Hidayati, N., & Sari, A. (2023). Celebrity worship dan dinamika fans di media sosial. Jurnal Psikologi Populer, 6(1), 41–56.

Lippmann, W. (2024). Public opinion (Revisi ed.). Free Press.

Martha, L., et al. (2024). Peran komunikasi dalam era digital. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 9(1), 12–26.

Moleong, L. J. (2021). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif (Edisi Revisi). Remaja Rosdakarya.

Muttaqin, I., & Sriyono, T. (2021). Opini publik dan demokrasi. Jurnal Demokrasi dan Politik, 9(2), 101–114.

Setiadi, A. (2023). Analisis jaringan opini publik di Twitter. Jurnal Komunikasi dan Media Sosial, 6(2), 122–134.

Sugiyono. (2020). Metode penelitian kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Syarifah, A., & Zuleika, R. (2024). Penyebaran hoaks politik di media sosial. Jurnal Media dan Politik, 12(2), 90–105.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-30

How to Cite

Adriana Airlia Yusrin, Maya May Syarah, & Herman Herman. (2025). Respon Publik Terhadap Kasus Seunghan RIIZE: Analisis Reputasi SM Entertainment Melalui Komentar Netizen di Platform Digital. Dialogika : Jurnal Penelitian Komunikasi Dan Sosialisasi, 1(2), 212–215. https://doi.org/10.62383/dialogika.v1i2.466

Similar Articles

<< < 3 4 5 6 7 8 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.