Environmental Issue in a Conflict Zone : The Influence of Security Actors on the Ukrainian-Russian Border

Authors

  • Wija Anarki Andi Cella Universitas Hasanuddin
  • Seniwati Seniwati Universitas Hasanuddin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/dialogika.v1i3.442

Keywords:

Ecocide, Environmental Degradation, Environmental Security, Security Actors, Ukraine Conflict

Abstract

The Russian invasion of Ukraine, which began in February 2022, has not only caused a humanitarian crisis but also triggered severe environmental consequences, particularly along the Ukrainian-Russian border. This study explores how military actions, occupation of sensitive ecological zones, and the targeting of industrial and critical infrastructure have led to widespread environmental degradation. Using a qualitative approach grounded in document analysis and legal frameworks, the research highlights how security actors have influenced the scale and nature of environmental damage. The findings reveal serious threats to soil quality, water safety, air purity, and biodiversity, as well as disruptions to waste management and energy systems. The paper also discusses the role of ecocide as a potential legal category for holding actors accountable for deliberate environmental harm. By situating the war within the broader context of environmental security and conflict ecology, the study argues for stronger international mechanisms to address ecological risks in armed conflict and post-war recovery.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Filho, W. L., Eustachio, J. H., Fedoruk, M., & Lisovska, T. (2024). War in Ukraine: An overview of environmental impacts and consequences for human health. Community Case Study, 14, Article 1423444. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsrma.2024.1423444

Hanoshenko, O., Halaktionov, M., & Huber-Humer, M. (2024). Exploratory study on the impact of [incomplete title]. Waste Management & Research, 00(0), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X241305909

Hryhorczuk, D., Levy, B. S., Prodanchuk, M., Kravchuk, O., Bubalo, N., Hryhorczuk, A., & Erickson, T. B. (2024). The environmental health impacts of Russia’s [incomplete title]. Journal of Occupational Health, 14, Article e00398. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12995-023-00398-y

Impact of the war in Ukraine on global environmental security. (2024). Proceedings of General Jonas Žemaitis Military Academy of Lithuania and University of Defence, Czech Republic, 8. https://doi.org/10.3849/cndcgs.2024.170

Kolmaš, M. (2023). Climate impacts of the Ukraine war. Czech Journal of International Relations, 5. https://doi.org/10.32422/cjir.787

Mihail, H., & Panayotova, M. H. (2022). The war in Ukraine from 2022 and its impact on the environment. Bulgarian Journal of International Economics and Politics, 19. https://doi.org/10.37075/BJIEP.2022.2.01

Serhii, S. A., Viktor, V. I., & Olena, B. P. (2022). The use of remote sensing data for investigation. Journal of Landscape Ecology, 18. https://doi.org/10.2478/jlecol-2022-0017

Shevchenko, O., & Horiacheva, K. (2024). Ecological component of the Russian-Ukrainian war. International Conference Knowledge-Based Organization, 30, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.2478/kbo-2024-0023

Solokha, M., Demyanyuk, O., Symochko, L., Mazur, S., Vynokurova, N., Sementsova, K., & Mariychuk, R. (2024). Soil degradation and contamination due to armed conflict. Land, 13(1614), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13101614

United Nations Environment Programme. (2022). The environmental impact of the conflict in Ukraine. Nairobi, Kenya. https://wedocs.unep.org/20.500.11822/40746

Wirtu, Y. D., & Abdela, U. (2025). Impact of war on the environment: Ecocide. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 13, Article 1539520. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2025.1539520

Downloads

Published

2025-06-23

How to Cite

Wija Anarki Andi Cella, & Seniwati Seniwati. (2025). Environmental Issue in a Conflict Zone : The Influence of Security Actors on the Ukrainian-Russian Border. Dialogika : Jurnal Penelitian Komunikasi Dan Sosialisasi, 1(3), 114–125. https://doi.org/10.62383/dialogika.v1i3.442