Komodifikasi Tubuh dalam Narasi "Pemersatu Bangsa" pada Kampanye Lingkungan: Analisis Wacana Kritis Konten Pandawara

Authors

  • Adinda Erliana Romadhon Universitas Trunojoyo Madura
  • Rizky Maulana Universitas Trunojoyo Madura

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/kajian.v2i4.824

Keywords:

Critical Discourse Analysis, Digital Media, Environmental Campaign, Gender Representation, Women’s Body

Abstract

This study examines the commodification of women’s bodies within environmental campaign content on digital media, focusing on a video produced by Pandawara Group that addresses textile waste issues. Although the campaign aims to raise ecological awareness, the visual emphasis on a female body particularly the exposure of a bra redirected public attention from environmental messages to sexualized interpretations in the comment section. This research aims to analyze how such meaning shifts occur through representation and audience interpretation. Using Sara Mills’ Critical Discourse Analysis, this study focuses on subject–object positioning and reader positioning in both visual and verbal elements of the content. The data consist of one campaign video and selected public comments on TikTok, analyzed qualitatively. The findings reveal that women are positioned as visual objects rather than active subjects within the discourse, while audiences are constructed as observers of the female body instead of interpreters of environmental issues. The recurring use of the phrase “content that unites the nation” further legitimizes sexualized readings and reinforces dominant gendered discourse. Importantly, the study finds that such interpretations are reproduced not only by male audiences but also by female users, indicating the internalization of dominant visual culture in digital spaces. This study contributes to gender and media studies by demonstrating that environmental campaigns are not free from gender bias and that visual representation plays a crucial role in shaping unintended meanings within social campaigns.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Banet-Weiser, S. (2018). Empowered: Popular feminism and popular misogyny. Duke University Press.

Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge.

Couldry, N. (2012). Media, society, world: Social theory and digital media practice. Polity Press.

Cox, R. (2013). Environmental communication and the public sphere (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman.

Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. A. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(2), 173–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x

Gill, R. (2007). Gender and the media. Polity Press.

Gill, R., & Scharff, C. (2011). New femininities: Postfeminism, neoliberalism and subjectivity. Palgrave Macmillan.

Hansen, A., & Machin, D. (2013). Media and communication research methods. Palgrave Macmillan.

Ida, R. (2014). Metodologi penelitian studi media dan kajian budaya. Kencana.

Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York University Press.

Kurnia, N. (2017). Perempuan dan media digital: Representasi, partisipasi, dan kekuasaan. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 14(1), 1–15.

Lazar, M. M. (2005). Feminist critical discourse analysis: Gender, power and ideology in discourse. Palgrave Macmillan.

McRobbie, A. (2009). The aftermath of feminism: Gender, culture and social change. Sage Publications.

Mills, S. (1997). Discourse. Routledge.

Mills, S. (2004). Discourse, gender and feminism. Dalam M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S. J. Yates (Eds.), Discourse as data: A guide for analysis (hlm. 72–92). Sage.

Mulvey, L. (1975). Visual pleasure and narrative cinema. Screen, 16(3), 6–18. https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/16.3.6

Pasaribu, A. L. (2023). Objektifikasi dan konstruksi cantik pada tubuh perempuan dalam akun Instagram @ugmcantik dan @unpad.geulis. Jurnal Riset Komunikasi (JURKOM), 6(2). https://doi.org/10.38194/jurkom.v6i2.796

van Dijk, T. A. (2001). Critical discourse analysis. In D. Tannen, D. Schiffrin, & H. Hamilton (Eds.), Handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 352–371). Blackwell.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-05

How to Cite

Adinda Erliana Romadhon, & Rizky Maulana. (2026). Komodifikasi Tubuh dalam Narasi "Pemersatu Bangsa" pada Kampanye Lingkungan: Analisis Wacana Kritis Konten Pandawara. Kajian Administrasi Publik Dan Ilmu Komunikasi, 2(4), 216–225. https://doi.org/10.62383/kajian.v2i4.824

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.